Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO2 Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems


Tuerkoglu Demirkol G. , Celik S. O. , Guenes Durak S., Acarer S., Cetin E. , Akarcay Demir S., ...More

POLYMERS, vol.13, no.19, 2021 (Journal Indexed in SCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 13 Issue: 19
  • Publication Date: 2021
  • Doi Number: 10.3390/polym13193201
  • Title of Journal : POLYMERS
  • Keywords: Fe2+, Mn2+, removal, membrane, fouling, DRINKING-WATER, SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, POLYMERIC MEMBRANES, MANGANESE REMOVAL, IRON, OXIDATION, UF, MICROFILTRATION, MECHANISM, AMMONIA

Abstract

Many treatment methods are used to remove iron and manganese from water. Aeration and membrane filtration are two of these methods. In this study, Fe2+ and Mn2+ removal by aeration with different catalysts and instead of simple membrane filtration applied in other studies, the aerated-submerged membrane systems were evaluated separately. When Fe(OH)(3) was applied in the aeration step and complete oxidation of Fe2+ was obtained after 27 min, while complete Mn2+ oxidation was obtained in 76 min. However, when MnO2 was applied in the aeration step, complete oxidation of Fe2+ and Mn2+ was relatively slow (36 and 110 min, respectively). According to the results obtained from the aerated membrane system, Fe2+ and Mn2+ removal were extended by Fe(OH)(3) via adsorption/surface oxidation. It is clearly shown from the flux, resistance results, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy observation that manganese oxides were deposited mainly in membrane pores forming membrane fouling by small flocs, while iron oxide particles were deposited on the membrane surface. Although the flux performance of PT PES membrane was higher than HF PP membrane, fouling resistance of HF PP membrane was higher than PT PES.